Open-source and public-record research
Search relevant public sources within the agreed purpose and record the jurisdictions covered.
Verify relevant public identity and background information, distinguishing confirmed records, possible matches and unresolved discrepancies.
Private background enquiries should be specific to a legitimate decision, not an indiscriminate search for personal information. We agree the questions, relevance threshold and lawful sources before collection begins.
Methods are selected only after purpose, legality, proportionality and evidentiary requirements have been assessed.
Search relevant public sources within the agreed purpose and record the jurisdictions covered.
Compare names with other identifiers and separate confirmed from possible matches.
Arrange dated records into a timeline and identify inconsistent or missing periods.
Assess who published the record, when it was updated and whether it has been independently corroborated.
Final deliverables depend on the agreed scope and what can lawfully and reliably be established.
A report structured around the agreed verification questions.
A table explaining the identity matches and dates relied on.
Referenced conclusions with the confidence of each material match stated.
Checks that could not be completed and those requiring consent or specialist authority.
Explain the decision you need to make and which claim matters: identity, a business interest, a stated role or a specific history. Use exact identifiers where lawfully available. Searches should be proportionate to that decision, with consent-based checks considered where appropriate.
Public records have different coverage and update cycles. A same-name result may concern another person, and an absent result is not proof of a clean history. Ask what was searched, the period covered and how the person was matched. Protected records require the relevant lawful authority.