Written evidence plan and collection protocol
Define the questions, collection authority, evidence sources and required reporting format.
Organise lawfully obtained records into a source register, chronology and factual report for legal or professional review.
Evidence is most useful when its source, date, handling and limitations are clear. Sceáwian designs collection and reporting around the decision-maker who will ultimately review the material.
Methods are selected only after purpose, legality, proportionality and evidentiary requirements have been assessed.
Define the questions, collection authority, evidence sources and required reporting format.
Assign source identifiers, retain originals and record receipt, copying and handling.
Compare independent sources and test contrary material before reaching conclusions.
Present findings with a chronology and exhibit references, marking reconstructed or inferred elements.
Final deliverables depend on the agreed scope and what can lawfully and reliably be established.
A concise report showing each question, finding and supporting evidence.
An exhibit index that lets a reviewer locate each original or working copy.
A dated sequence of events with references and any unresolved timing gaps.
An explanation of methods, provenance, handling and evidence limitations.
Identify the factual questions and the person who will use the report. Keep original files unchanged and note how they were obtained. Explain if material has been cropped, forwarded, exported or annotated so its limitations can be recorded.
Agree the required format and deadline with your adviser. Ask whether further verification, witness evidence or technical analysis is needed. A report cannot repair an unknown source or missing original, and no investigator can promise that every item will be admissible.