Identity and source corroboration
Compare identifiers across sources and reject matches based only on a shared name.
Research to verify tracing leads and family connections, with identity checks and a safety assessment before sharing location information.
Tracing work requires sensitivity, verification and respect for the located person’s privacy. We begin with known identifiers and relationships, then assess lawful records and open-source leads without making unverified contact promises.
Methods are selected only after purpose, legality, proportionality and evidentiary requirements have been assessed.
Compare identifiers across sources and reject matches based only on a shared name.
Search relevant lawful records and public references, documenting their dates and coverage.
Assess whether third-party contact is appropriate without disclosing unnecessary personal details.
Rank leads by corroboration, recency and relevance, and record why false matches were excluded.
Final deliverables depend on the agreed scope and what can lawfully and reliably be established.
A record of searches performed and how promising or excluded leads were assessed.
Identifiers supported by sources, with uncertainty stated explicitly.
A list of potential leads, their dates, confidence and remaining verification steps.
Options for further lawful enquiry or consent-based contact, without promising a reunion.
Prepare the last known contact date, verified name, approximate age, earlier addresses and the reason for the enquiry. Explain any existing police involvement or safety concern. Distinguish a lost-contact search from an urgent missing-person situation; immediate danger requires police or emergency assistance.
A located adult may not wish to reconnect. Ask how identity will be verified, consent to contact considered and safety risks assessed before details are disclosed. No trace can guarantee a current location, successful contact or the willingness of the person to respond.